In a move hailed by pro-life advocates and traditionalists, Pope Leo XIV has appointed Cardinal Baldassare Reina as the new Grand Chancellor of the Pontifical Theological Institute “John Paul II” for the Sciences of Marriage and the Family. This marks the first major appointment of Leo XIV’s papacy and signals a potential shift away from the reforms implemented under Pope Francis.

In a pivotal moment marking the beginning of a new era in the Roman Curia, Pope Leo XIV has taken a decisive step by appointing Cardinal Baldassare Reina as the Grand Chancellor of the Pontifical Theological Institute “John Paul II” for the Sciences of Marriage and the Family. This appointment, announced by the Holy See Press Office, is the first significant nomination of Leo XIV’s papacy and is being celebrated by pro-life advocates worldwide.
READ MORE ARTICLES:
- Pope Leo XIV Appoints Cardinal Reina as Grand Chancellor of John Paul II Institute, Signaling Shift in Church Direction
- Global Welcome for Pope Leo XIV on Instagram
- Black Smoke Rises Over Vatican as Cardinals Fail to Election
- Concerns Rise Among LGBTQ+ Catholics Over Past and Now
- The 2025 Papal Conclave
Cardinal Reina, a 54-year-old clergyman with a distinguished career in the Diocese of Rome, assumes his new role with an impressive record of service. Elevated to the cardinalate in December 2024, Reina has been the vicar general of the Diocese of Rome since October 2024 and previously served as an auxiliary bishop for two years. His commitment to orthodox teachings, particularly on pro-life issues, signals a potential return to the foundational values championed by the John Paul II Institute prior to the controversial reforms initiated under Pope Francis.
The appointment of Cardinal Reina marks a significant shift in the leadership and direction of the John Paul II Institute, which has faced scrutiny and criticism in recent years. Under the leadership of Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, who served as Grand Chancellor since 2016, the Institute underwent substantial changes that many viewed as a departure from its original mission. These changes were part of broader reforms within the Roman Curia during Pope Francis’ pontificate, aimed at modernizing and restructuring various Vatican institutions.
In 2019, the John Paul II Institute became a focal point of controversy when its president, Monsignor Livio Melina, was dismissed, and all professors were suspended. This move was widely criticized by traditionalists and pro-life advocates, who saw it as an attempt to undermine the Institute’s dedication to promoting the Church’s teachings on marriage and family. New faculty members were appointed who espoused positions that diverged from the Institute’s previous stances, including advocating for homosexuality and contraception.
Monsignor Melina, in the wake of his removal, voiced strong opposition to the reforms, stating, “If the decisions taken by Archbishop Paglia are not revoked, then what they are saying is: ‘The interpretation of the magisterium of Pope Francis in continuity with the previous Magisterium is intolerable in the Church.’” His remarks underscored the deep divisions within the Church regarding the direction of its teachings and governance.
Archbishop Paglia, now 80, has been a prominent figure in the Church’s recent history. Appointed by Pope Francis to lead both the John Paul II Institute and the Pontifical Academy for Life, Paglia played a central role in implementing the reforms mandated by Francis. His tenure saw the transformation of the Institute’s mission and structure, aligning it more closely with the progressive vision of Pope Francis’ pontificate.
The appointment of Cardinal Reina as Paglia’s successor has been met with optimism by those advocating for a return to the Institute’s foundational principles. Many view this decision as a clear statement by Pope Leo XIV about the direction he intends to steer the Church. Pro-life organizations and traditionalists have expressed hope that Reina’s leadership will restore the Institute’s commitment to defending the sanctity of marriage and family in accordance with Church teachings.
Cardinal Reina’s appointment also reflects the broader priorities of Pope Leo XIV’s papacy. Since his election, Leo XIV has emphasized the importance of continuity with the Church’s rich theological tradition while addressing contemporary challenges. By placing a trusted and orthodox figure at the helm of the John Paul II Institute, Leo XIV has demonstrated his commitment to preserving the Church’s moral teachings while fostering intellectual and spiritual renewal.
As the new Grand Chancellor, Cardinal Reina faces the formidable task of navigating the legacy of recent reforms while charting a course for the Institute’s future. His tenure will undoubtedly be closely watched by both supporters and critics, as it will serve as a bellwether for the broader direction of Pope Leo XIV’s pontificate.
For pro-life advocates and defenders of traditional Church teachings, this appointment represents a moment of hope and an opportunity for renewal. Cardinal Reina’s leadership promises to bring a renewed focus on the principles that have long defined the John Paul II Institute—principles rooted in the enduring wisdom of the Church’s teachings on marriage, family, and the sanctity of life. In this pivotal moment, the Church stands poised to reaffirm its commitment to these timeless values, guided by a new leader whose vision aligns with its sacred mission.
The turmoil within the Vatican’s John Paul II Institute and the Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV) highlights a deep ideological divide within the Catholic Church under Pope Francis’ leadership. This discord has raised concerns about the Church’s future direction on pivotal issues related to morality, life, and family.
Phil Lawler, a veteran Catholic journalist, captured the sentiment of many when he wrote, “The purge at the John Paul II Institute has eliminated the faculty members most closely associated with the thought of the Pope — and canonized saint — after whom the Institute is named.” This observation underscores a broader unease about the Institute’s transformation. Once a bastion of theological thought rooted in the teachings of Saint John Paul II, it has now been reshaped to align with what critics perceive as a more progressive vision.
The shift began with the tenure of Monsignor Livio Melina, whose presidency was marked by staunch adherence to traditional Catholic teachings. However, subsequent leaders have advocated for positions that diverge significantly from this legacy, including the acceptance of blessings for homosexual couples and their participation in sacraments. This shift has triggered a wave of resistance from theologians and ethicists worldwide. They view the changes not only as a departure from John Paul II’s vision but also as a reflection of broader controversies surrounding Pope Francis’ papacy.
The upheaval at the John Paul II Institute mirrors similar transformations at the Pontifical Academy for Life. In 2016, Pope Francis issued new statutes for the PAV, removing the requirement for members to uphold the Church’s pro-life teachings. The Academy’s expanded mandate now includes issues like environmental sustainability, a move critics argue dilutes its original mission. These changes have led some to describe the PAV as being influenced by “heretical gnosticism.”
Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, appointed by Pope Francis to lead both the PAV and the John Paul II Institute in 2016, has been a central figure in these controversies. Paglia’s tenure has been marred by a series of contentious actions and statements. His advocacy for the divorced and remarried to receive Holy Communion and his defense of assisted suicide and contraception have drawn widespread criticism. Additionally, Paglia’s remarks attacking Catholics who opposed abortion-tainted COVID-19 vaccines further fueled tensions.
The archbishop’s tenure has not been without scandal. Allegations of financial corruption have surfaced, with claims that charitable funds were diverted to renovate his Vatican apartment. Perhaps most infamously, Paglia commissioned a homoerotic mural in his cathedral. The mural, painted by a homosexual Argentinian artist known for depicting male bodies, featured Paglia himself among a scene of naked figures, prompting outrage and scandal.
While Paglia remains president of the PAV, the John Paul II Institute’s leadership continues under Monsignor Philippe Bordeyne. Bordeyne’s views on traditional Catholic morality and his advocacy for homosexual relationships have similarly sparked concern among conservative Catholics.
The transformations at these institutions reflect a broader debate within the Church about its identity and mission in the modern world. For some, these changes represent a necessary evolution, embracing inclusivity and addressing contemporary challenges. For others, they signify a departure from core Catholic teachings, threatening the Church’s moral and theological foundations.
As these controversies unfold, they raise fundamental questions about the balance between tradition and progress within the Catholic Church. The legacy of Saint John Paul II and the institutions bearing his name remain at the heart of this pivotal and ongoing debate. – omnizers.com